Having <sth> isn't always <adj>

🎧 Listen first (recording with noise - use this to get used to understanding despite the external challenges)


Try to repeat without checking the script

🎧 Listen again (no noise, CHUNKED)


🎧 Listen again (no noise, REGULAR)


Give us your ideas for the use👇👇👇👇👇

Check the script - Remember to log is to be able to see the picture

Having at least 3 routes to a priority target isn't always efficient and sometimes it may waste many of resources, but it does give us a flexible choice when met the chemical issues.

Having problems with a the project is not always a bad thing, you can learn more from these project. Not only the reaction methods, but also the problem-solving methods and how to communicate with the clients.

Having a mature route isn't always straightforward, we should take much effort to screen conditions.

Having chemistry problem is not always bad for the new employees, they can learn more skills, such as chemistry knowledges, how to solve the problem, how to screen the conditions and how to adjust the reaction conditions based on the failed conditions.

Having all conditions to consider when completing a Suzuki experiment isn't always catalyst. It conclude base, temperature, solvent.

BoGao replied at 2024-3-20 22:35
Having all conditions to consider when completing a Suzuki experiment isn't always catalyst. It conc ...

please try this one again

NaGe replied at 2024-3-20 21:40
Having chemistry problem is not always bad for the new employees, they can learn more skills, such a ...

pls check
"knowledges"

XiaorongZhang replied at 2024-3-20 20:12
Having a mature route isn't always straightforward, we should take much effort to screen conditions.

we PUT effort into sth
sth TAKES effort [away from us]